TOPIC GUIDE: Green Belt
"We need to build on the Green Belt"
PUBLISHED: 31 Jan 2013
AUTHOR: Jason Smith
Share this Topic Guide:
A green belt is an area surrounding a town or city where building development is restricted. The stated aim of green belt policy is to restrict the sprawl of built up areas on to previously undeveloped land and to preserve the character of historic towns [Ref: DEFRA]. The first green belts were introduced in the 1950s following the passing of the Town and Country Planning Act in 1947. Today, there are14 green belts around most of England’s bigger cities and amount to 1.65 million hectares, about 13 per cent of the country [Ref: Economist]. ‘Special areas of conservation’, ‘sites of special scientific interest’ and ‘areas of outstanding natural beauty’ account for a further 29.8 per cent of the country where development is restricted [Ref: bshf]. A new report by the think-tank Policy Exchange says that by contrast, “developed” land, which includes parks, allotments, golf courses and gardens as well as concrete, covers just 10.6% of England and they suggest relaxing the rules on new development [Ref: Policy Exchange]. Those who see problems with green belts point to London as an example. They argue that the 40-mile wide green belt around London strangles the life out of the capital - responsible for restricting economic growth, for the high cost of housing, and for encouraging the destruction of valuable green space within cities, such as playing fields, allotments and gardens. [Ref: Guardian]. Others say that green belts have been a success, saving the English countryside from being disfigured by unthinking development. They are concerned that short-term economic interests will lead us to desecrating our natural heritage and endangering our long-term wellbeing [Ref: Independent].
For further reading use the menu bar on the right hand side.
Green Belt DEBATE IN CONTEXT
This section provides a summary of the key issues in the debate, set in the context of recent discussions and the competing positions that have been adopted.
House prices in the UK have almost doubled in the last decade and with prices now approaching eight times the average wage [Ref: Guardian]. Millions of people sit on council housing registers waiting for housing, and the age at which people buy their first home is rising – restricting opportunities for young people [Ref: Guardian]. Some have estimated that 232,000 new homes need to be built each year in England just to replace Britain’s ageing housing stock before we even consider building the extra homes people now need [Ref: spiked]. Given that over 90% of the UK population now live in cities, many ask how this problem will be tackled unless cities are allowed to expand. Others also argue that we have a romantic view of the green belts – that, rather than being chosen for its beauty or environmental qualities, much of it is used for intensive farming and light industry [Ref: Economist]. Since 2010, planning consents approvals have fallen by 24% - building more houses would help address homelessness, push down rents and house prices, and provide jobs for thousands who are currently on the dole [Ref: National Housing Federation]. Freeing up just 1% of green belt land alone could provide space for 300,000 new homes.
Access to green spaces
Opponents of relaxing regulations on green belt development counter that the countryside surrounding cities is a vital asset that gives city dwellers access to green open space, helps retain the unique character of cities, towns and villages, and is valuable and important farming land [Ref: Guardian]. They also point out the dangers flooding poses to housing built on new land – estimating that half of all houses built in Britain since WWII have been built on land vulnerable to flooding. Concreting over the countryside only risks exacerbating the problem [Ref: Telegraph]. Expanses of green space have environmental benefits, counteracting the ‘heat sinks’ of cities and enabling local food to be grown, thus reducing food miles. It is not green belts which are the cause of housing problems, they argue, but rather economic issues which are to blame [Ref: Telegraph].
Building on the brownfield
Protectors of the green belt don’t deny that new housing is not needed. Instead, they recommend building on “brownfield” land – building on previously used, now derelict land within cities. According to the Government’s own National Land Use Database, this brownfield land has space for over 1.5 million new dwellings [Ref: CPRE]. This isn’t always in the right place though – London needs approximately 1 million new homes to meet the demands of its growing population as well as addressing a backlog, yet only has 4,000 hectares of brownfield land – enough to meet around a fifth of this demand [Ref: Guardian]. Others look to addressing the demand side of housing – immigration puts pressure on housing stock and lower levels would reduce the need for so many new houses [Ref: Daily Mail]. Others point to elderly couples living alone in large family houses, and that encouraging them to downsize could free up housing for families [Ref: BBC News]. But critics of existing planning processes point to the severe restrictions home owners face when they are prevented from extending their homes on land they already own. These existing restrictions do not protect the countryside, it’s argued, and when people have been made to apply for retrospective permission for a child’s Wendy House in the back garden [Ref: Daily Mail] is it now time to review Green Belt restrictions?
It is crucial for debaters to have read the articles in this section, which provide essential information and arguments for and against the debate motion. Students will be expected to have additional evidence and examples derived from independent research, but they can expect to be criticised if they lack a basic familiarity with the issues raised in the essential reading.
Rowan Moore Guardian 19 October 2014
Oliver Wainwright Guardian 17 March 2014
Campaign to Protect Rural England August 2012
Economist 30 June 2012
Paul Simons Guardian 22 February 2017
James Heartfield spiked 27 April 2016
Juliet Samuel Telegraph 20 April 2016
Tim Montgomery The Times 25 September 2015
James Heartfield spiked 20 September 2012
Economist 8 September 2012
Ian Birrell Guardian 20 August 2012
Colin Wiles Guardian 16 May 2012
Daily Mail 5 February 2017
Telegraph 4 February 2017
Emma Bridgewater Telegraph 3 February 2017
Simon Jenkins Spectator 28 February 2015
Harry Wallop Telegraph 10 September 2012
Marton Roberts Huffington Post 7 September 2012
Fiona Reynolds Telegraph 3 September 2011
Oliver Hilliam Guardian 28 July 2010
Department for communities and local government Gov.UK 7 February 2017
London First January 2015
Nick Pearce Observer 9 December 2012
Jim Pickard Financial Times 23 September 2012
Definitions of key concepts that are crucial for understanding the topic. Students should be familiar with these terms and the different ways in which they are used and interpreted and should be prepared to explain their significance.
Useful websites and materials that provide a good starting point for research.
Douglas Murray Guardian 19 April 2017
Economist 11 February 2017
James Heartfield spiked 10 February 2017
Ben Rochelle Huffington Post 10 February 2017
Alice Thomson The Times 8 February 2017
Alister Scott Independent 8 February 2017
Mark Swilling Guardian 12 July 2016
Sam Bowman Londonist January 2016
Simon Jenkins Evening Standard 6 October 2015
Bill Bryson The Times 30 September 2015
Patrick Barkham Guardian 1 October 2014
Eric Pickles Telegraph 13 June 2014
Colin Wiles Guardian 21 May 2014
Paul Cheshire City A.M 11 November 2013
Hannah Fearn Guardian 13 September 2013
Michelle Hanson Guardian 11 December 2012
Roger Scruton Telegraph 1 December 2012
Tim Stansfeld Planning 27 November 2012
Tim Ross Telegraph 13 September 2012
Craig Bennett Politics.co.uk 9 September 2012
Alex Morton Policy Exchange 20 August 2012
Isabel Hardman Spectator 17 August 2012
Independent 21 March 2012
Independent 21 March 2012
Adam Smith Institute 8 March 2012
Andrew Carter Centre for Cities 23 January 2012
BBC News 15 September 2011
Tim Leunig Inside Housing
Links to organisations, campaign groups and official bodies who are referenced within the Topic Guide or which will be of use in providing additional research information.
IN THE NEWS
Relevant recent news stories from a variety of sources, which ensure students have an up to date awareness of the state of the debate.
Telegraph 28 April 2017
Telegraph 17 March 2017
The Times 13 February 2017
Evening Standard 5 February 2017
Guardian 5 February 2017
Evening Standard 5 February 2017
Daily Mail 21 January 2017
Guardian 15 January 2017
Guardian 2 January 2017
Huffington Post 13 December 2016
Telegraph 26 November 2016
Guardian 2 June 2016
Guardian 25 April 2016
Independent 10 July 2015
Guardian 8 September 2014
Guardian 26 April 2014
Coventry Telegraph 29 January 2013
Surrey Today 23 January 2013
BBC News 10 January 2013
Guardian 22 December 2012
Telegraph 25 November 2012
Telegraph 4 November 2012
Guardian 13 September 2012
Guardian 20 August 2012
Daily Mail 26 March 2012
Telegraph 23 November 2011
Telegraph 13 August 2011
This site contains links to websites operated by parties other than Debating Matters. Although we make every effort to ensure links are current, they will sometimes break after Topic Guide publication. If a link does not work, then the publication reference and date should enable you to find an alternate link. If you find a broken link do please send it to the webmaster for review.
TOPIC GUIDE MENU
Select the relevant option
Related topic guides