TOPIC GUIDE: IVF

"It is irresponsible to provide IVF to women in their fifties"

PUBLISHED: 01 May 2013

AUTHOR: Tony Gilland

Share this Topic Guide:



Download topic guide (500k)

INTRODUCTION

When Professor Robert Edwards, the Nobel winning scientist who pioneered IVF treatment, died In April 2013, the tributes poured in from scientists and families for the positive impact his work has had for millions [Ref: BBC News]. Since the birth of Louise Brown in 1978, the world’s first IVF baby, advances in Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) have been substantial; one of the latest developments being the use of new ovarian tissue transplant techniques to allow a small number of women treated for cancer to naturally ovulate and conceive subsequent to their cancer treatment [Ref: Bionews]. However, with these advances controversy has also ensued. Some now see the biggest call on IVF to be age related fertility problems, caused by women delaying motherhood for too long, leading to concerns that IVF lulls women into a false sense of security. High on the agenda is the question of older mums through high profile cases such as Carole Hobson, the 58 year-old first time single mum who gave birth to twins in 2011 [Ref: Daily Mail], or the Spanish mother, María Carmen del Bousada, who died in 2009 leaving behind two-year old twins she gave birth to aged 66. This has raised questions about whether women determined to have a child late in life are putting their own interests above that of the child and whether IVF clinicians should exercise greater responsibility and restraint with regard to who they agree to treat. Whilst some fertility clinics have been accused of unscrupulous behaviour and irresponsibly marketing false hopes to people desperate to have children, advances in the field led NICE to update it’s guidance on what treatments should be made available on the NHS in February 2013, including an increase in the age at which women should receive some treatment on the NHS from 39 to 42 [Ref: Guardian].

For further reading use the menu bar on the right hand side.

IVF DEBATE IN CONTEXT

This section provides a summary of the key issues in the debate, set in the context of recent discussions and the competing positions that have been adopted.

What are the regulations?
In the UK, there is no legal age limit at which a woman can receive fertility treatment, and no limit that is specified or enforced by the regulatory body the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority [Ref: HFEA]. Clinicians are required to meet the clinical best practice standard – that the patient’s health will allow them to go through the treatment and the potential pregnancy. They are also required by law to carry out a Welfare of the Child assessment before starting any treatment. This looks at factors which are likely to cause serious harm, either to the child to be born or to any existing child of the family, possibly including the eventuality that a mother might die before her child reaches adulthood or become unable to care for the child. Whilst many UK clinics will not treat women over the age of 50, 141 women over that age gave birth in 2010 – treble the number that did so a decade earlier [Ref: Daily Mail]. Other women, including many of the ‘oldest mums’ hitting the headlines, have obtained treatment from other countries. In the United States, where there is no legal restriction on the age at which women can receive treatment, the American Society for Reproductive Medicine changed its guidance in spring 2013 from ‘discouraging’ treatment of women over 50 to arguing ‘particularly in the age range of 50–54’ that treatment is not ‘such a significant departure from other currently accepted fertility treatments as to be considered ethically inappropriate in postmenopausal women’ [Ref: ASRM]

Bad for the mother or bad mums?
It is now widely accepted that younger women should be able to use ARTs to overcome the barriers that nature has placed in their way, so why deny post-menopausal women the same chance? Whilst some concerns have been raised about greater risks to women giving birth later in life, especially in relation to pre-eclampsia and diabetes [Ref: BBC News], greater concerns have been expressed about post-menopausal mothers struggling to cope with the demands of bringing up young children and being out of kilter with their peers [Ref: Telegraph]. Others argue that the proportion of IVF babies born to women in their forties is rising, so these older mums might not be as abnormal as we think, and there is no clear place to draw the line. From this viewpoint, decisions should be made on a case-by-case basis, and the choice should be down to the woman and the doctor who treats her [Ref: Guardian]. However, the death in July 2009 of María Carmen del Bousada [Ref: The Times] reignited debate about the ‘selfishness’ of post-menopausal women who have children and the irresponsibility of some IVF clinicians. Much commentary focused on the problems caused for children by having mothers who were statistically more likely to die, or become ill or infirm, before their children reached adulthood. In this view, concern about the welfare of the child born as a result of fertility treatment should provide a clear reason why much older mothers should be denied treatment. Indeed, Janet Maslin-Bosher, who gave birth to twins at the age of 58 in 2002, was reported ten years on, to now be in favour of an age restriction for IVF treatment of around 50, despite her ten year old twins being her ‘joy and salvation’ [Ref: Daily Mail]. Others point out that there is a double standard in the debate, in that older men are able to father children naturally and talk positively about the experience [Ref: The Times], so why should such a fuss be made when women do the same thing? No parent, whatever their age, can guarantee that they will not become ill or die before their children are grown up, and some women are healthier in their 60s than others in their 20s. If it is assumed that children love their parents whatever age they are, can being born to an older mother actually damage the child?

False hope or better options for 21st Century mothers?
Whilst much of the debate has focused on post-menopausal women, broader concerns have been raised about the IVF industry offering false hope to women and fuelling an unhealthy approach to parenthood as another lifestyle choice.  Advances in techniques for egg freezing have brought this aspect of the debate into sharper focus. Until recently egg freezing was primarily offered to young women in extreme situations, such as those requiring cancer therapy. But recognition of the importance of the age of the eggs to the success of IVF, coupled with the development of vitrification techniques with success rates comparable to the use of fresh eggs of the same age, has led some clinics to offer egg freezing services to healthy women [Ref: The Times]. The purpose of the service is to allow women to improve their chances of having children later in life, if that turns out to be desirable or necessary for them. According to Dr Gillian Lockwood, Medical Director of Midland Fertility Services, so-called ‘social egg freezing’ could come to have as positive an impact on women’s lives in the future as the introduction of the contraceptive pill in the 1960s. [Ref: Focus on Reproduction]. However others, such as the IVF pioneer Lord Robert Winston, argue that there is a danger in over-emphasising arguments around choice and individual autonomy and that some fertility clinics are playing an ‘expensive confidence trick’ on women by failing to underline the low success rates associated with egg-freezing,  and IVF more broadly. [Ref: Daily Mail]. In the context of competing demands for women of an education and a career, alongside the difficulties of finding Mr Right, advocates argue that advances in ART are offering more and better options to women with regard to their choices about motherhood. Critics fear turning parenthood into just another lifestyle choice, to be fitted around the demands of a career and busy social life, and encouraging a generation of selfish ‘Bridget Joneses’ tying to ‘have it all’ [Ref: Daily Mail]. Some, such as journalist and writer Liza Mundy argue that it is an unforgiving work culture that doesn’t see childbearing for female employees as convenient that is driving the growth in late motherhood, not a widening ‘exercise of choice’ [Ref: New Atlantis]. But champions of older mums dismiss such concerns as paternalistic, arguing that women are capable of weighing up such risks, costs and benefits for themselves. With further scientific and technological advances to be expected, such as those potentially opened up by successful ovarian transplants [Ref: Telegraph], is it time to applaud the possibilities of late motherhood opened up by IVF or to draw a line under attempts to defy the female biological clock and wake up to the necessary constraints and responsibilities of parenthood?

ESSENTIAL READING

It is crucial for debaters to have read the articles in this section, which provide essential information and arguments for and against the debate motion. Students will be expected to have additional evidence and examples derived from independent research, but they can expect to be criticised if they lack a basic familiarity with the issues raised in the essential reading.

What is society’s problem with elderly mothers?

Dr Daniel Sokol BBC News 26 January 2010

Should we impose an age limit on IVF?

Dr Peter Bowen-Simpkins V Dr Gillian Lockwood The Times 29 May 2009

AGAINST

Why I’m having my first baby at 51

Naomi Gryn Guardian 9 November 2012

Social egg freezing: time to come in from the cold

Dr Gillian Lockwood Focus on Reproduction September 2009

Why older women turn out to be better mothers

Lowri Turner Daily Mail 21 February 2008

What’s wrong with the World’s Oldest Mum?

Jennie Bristow spiked 18 January 2005

IN DEPTH

Fertility: will we ever win the egg race?

Laura Donnelly Telegraph 10 April 2011

Fertility: stop all the clocks

Victoria Lambert Telegraph 26 November 2009

In Favour of Freezing Eggs For Non-Medical Reasons

Julian Savulescu and Imogen Goold Bioethics 1 January 2008

The ethics of egg donation in the over fifties

Anna Smajdor Menopause International 2008

Parenthood at any price

Cheryl Miller New Atlantis 2007

KEY TERMS

Definitions of key concepts that are crucial for understanding the topic. Students should be familiar with these terms and the different ways in which they are used and interpreted and should be prepared to explain their significance.

BACKGROUNDERS

Useful websites and materials that provide a good starting point for research.

Freezing eggs – costly con or insurance against infertility?

BBC Radio 4 'Woman’s Hour' 14 April 2011

An Ethical Assessment of Postmenopausal Motherhood Against the Backdrop of Successful Antiaging

Uta Bittner and Tobias Eicinger Rejuvenation Research, Vol 13, No 6 2010

How old is too old to give birth?

Bioethicsbytes 27 July 2009

The joys of being an older parent

Richard Parkes The Times 23 July 2009

New research challenges stereotypes about older mums

Macquarie University Physorg 8 July 2009

When are you too old for IVF?

BBC Radio 4 ' Woman’s Hour' 14 January 2009

Reproduction and Responsibility

The President's Council on Bioethics March 2004

IVF for Older Women

The Infertility Centre of St Louis

Pregnancy complications in older women

Elizabeth Eden HowStuffWorks

ORGANISATIONS

Links to organisations, campaign groups and official bodies who are referenced within the Topic Guide or which will be of use in providing additional research information.

IN THE NEWS

Relevant recent news stories from a variety of sources, which ensure students have an up to date awareness of the state of the debate.

Boom in new mums in their fifties

Telegraph 31 October 2010

Welcome to the new ice age

Australian 3 July 2010

Concerns over older mother trend

BBC News 12 June 2009

AUDIO/VISUAL

Freezing eggs – costly con or insurance against infertility?

BBC Radio 4 'Woman’s Hour' 14 April 2011

When are you too old for IVF?

BBC Radio 4 ' Woman’s Hour' 14 January 2009

This site contains links to websites operated by parties other than Debating Matters. Although we make every effort to ensure links are current, they will sometimes break after Topic Guide publication. If a link does not work, then the publication reference and date should enable you to find an alternate link. If you find a broken link do please send it to the webmaster for review.

© 2014 debatingmatters.com: Debating Matters Competition, Academy of Ideas Ltd, Signet House, 49-51 Farringdon Road, London, EC1M 3JP, UK

Tel +44 (0)20 7269 9233 - Fax (0)20 7269 9235 - debatingmatters@instituteofideas.com | admin login